ISBN
Formato digital
979-13-87837-97-6
Fecha de publicación
04-12-2025
Licencia
D. R. © copyright 2025 Nina Martínez Arellano. Mexicali, B. C., México
Todos los contenidos de esta obra se comparten bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atri-bución/Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Esto implica que no está autorizado el uso comercial de la obra original ni de las eventuales obras derivadas, las cuales deberán distribuirse bajo la misma licencia que rige la obra original. No obstante, se permite a terceros compartir el contenido siempre y cuando se reconozca debidamente la autoría y la publicación original en esta editorial.
Jennifer Lizeth Espinoza Romero
Universidad de Sonora
0000-0002-9691-1970
Martha Frías Armenta
Universidad de Sonora
0000-0001-5155-5485
Acerca de
El derecho de participación en niños, niñas y adolescentes (NNA) es un derecho clave para el ejercicio de otros derechos. El marco de enfoque de capacidad y capacidades en desarrollo analiza qué factores dentro del control social, como la familia, amigos y creencia en las leyes y autorida-des, y factores como rasgos de personalidad, se relacionan con el ejercicio del derecho de participación de NNA. El objetivo del estudio fue analizar los factores protectores informales y de personalidad relacionados con el conocimiento y ejercicio del derecho de participación en la escuela. En una muestra de 342 NNA y jóvenes, se utilizaron medidas de autorreporte para evaluar las variables del estudio y se corrió un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales para analizar el efecto entre los factores. Los resultados mos-traron la importancia de investigar el ejercicio de derechos de NNA en su vida cotidiana y el papel de un ambiente familiar positivo.
Referencias
Arciprete, C., Biggeri, M., & Fattacciu, I. (2024). Empowering youth in care: the case of emancipatory research with care leavers. Journal De Ciencias Sociales, 2(23), 22-43. https://doi.org/10.18682/jcs.v2i23.9793
Bacon, A. M., Corr, P. J., & Satchell, L. P. (2018). A reinforcement sensitivity theory explanation of antisocial behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.008
Ballet, J., Biggeri, M. & Comim, F. (2011). Children’s agency and the capability approach: A conceptual framework. In M. Biggeri, J. Ballet, and F. Comim (Eds.), Children and the capability approach (pp. 22–45). Palgrave Macmillan.
Biggeri, M., & Arciprete, C. (2022). Children as Capable Agents and Citizen: Empowering Children and Youth. In G. Tonon (Ed.), Social Justice for Children in the South (Vol. 9, pp. 157-175). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5045- 2_9
Brennan, G. M., Moffitt, T. E., Bourassa, K. J., Harrington, H., Hogan, S., Houts, R. M., … & Caspi, A. (2024). The continuity of adversity: Negative emotionality links early life adversity with adult stressful life events. Clinical Psychological Science, 21677026231220337.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1997). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
Chang, Y., Yoon, S., Maguire-Jack, K., & Lee, J. (2022). Family-, school-, and neighborhood-level predictors of resilience for adolescents with a history of maltreatment. Children, 10(1), 1. doi: 10.3390/children10010001
Cole, N. (2020). Understanding socialization in sociology. ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/ socialization-in-sociology-4104466
Comim, F. (2021). A post-generalizability method for human development indicators. Social Indicators Research, 158(3), 1179–1198. doi:10.1007/s11205-021-02737-0
Contreras, E. J. (2020). Agencia desde su mirada: Exploración del sentido de agencia desde la participación de una organización de niños, niñas y adolescentes de Belén-Iquitos. [Tesis de Maestría]. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. ProQuest.
Contreras, L., Paulsen, C. & Gómez, E. (2018). Serious Violations of Rights in Children and Adolescents: Variables of Family Functioning. Universitas Psychologica, 17(3), 96-108.
Corr, P. J. & Cooper, A. J. (2016). The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ): Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 28(11), 1427–1440. https:// doi.org/10.1037/pas0000273
Corr, P. J., & Krupić, D. (2016). Motivating personality: Approach, avoidance, and their conflict. In A. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in motivation science. Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2017.02.003
Corr, P. J. & McNaughton, N. (2012). Neuroscience and approach/avoidance personality traits: A two stage (valuation–motivation) approach. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(10), 2339-2354.
Corr, P. J., & Mutinelli, S. (2017). Motivation and young people’s career planning: A perspective from the reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 126-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.043
Corr, P. J. (2004). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 28(3), 317-332.
Davies, C., Waters, D., & Fraser, J. (2025). Towards Independence: The Development of Children’s Capability to Have a Voice in Their Healthcare. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2025.2454578
Đorđević, S. (2024). Detection of Risk Factors and Prevention of Violent Behavior in the Education System. Kultura Polisa, 21(2), 215–251, https://doi.org/10.51738/Kpolisa2024.21.2r.215dj
Earnhart, D. & Friesen, L. (2013). Can punishment generate specific deterrence without updating? analysis of a stated choice scenario. Environmental and Resource Economics, 56(3), 379- 397.
Espinoza-Romero, J. L., Frías-Armenta, M., Lucas, M. Y., & Corral-Frías, N. S. (2022). Behavioral activation system and early life parental abuse are associated with antisocial behaviors in Mexican adolescents. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(3), 1584.
Farrell, N., & Walker, B. R. (2019). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and the 2× 2 standpoints model of achievement goals. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 317-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.035
Fernandes, L. (2024). The economics of human development: ‘Investing in children’ or ‘children as an investment’? And why it matters. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/14639491241268126
Franchina, V., Klackl, J., & Jonas, E. (2024). The reinforcement sensitivity theory affects questionnaire (RST-AQ). A validation study of a new scale targeting affects related to anxiety, approach motivation and fear. Current Psychology, 43(6), 5193-5205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04623-z
Frías, M., Millanes, R., y Sosa, K. (2017). Validación de una escala de control social. Trabajo presentado en el XXV Congreso Mexicano de Psicología, celebrado en Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco.
Goldberg, J. M., Sklad, M., Elfrink, T. R., Schreurs, K. M. G., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & Clarke, A. M. (2019). Effectiveness of interventions adopting a whole school approach to enhancing social and emotional development: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(4), 755–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0406-9
Gubbels, J., Assink, M., & van der Put, C. (2023). Protective factors for antisocial behavior in youth: What is the meta-analytic evidence? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 53, 233-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01878-4
Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. y Black, W. C. (2010). Análisis Multivariante. Prentice Hall.
Hanson, K., & Nieuwenhuys, O. (2013). Reconceptualizing Children’s Rights in International Development: Living Rights, Social Justice, Translations. Cambridge University Press.
Hart, C. S., & Brando, N. (2018). A capability approach to children’s well-being, agency and participatory rights in education. European Journal of Education, 53(3), 293–309.
Hirschi, T. (1969). A control theory of delinquency. Criminology theory: Selected classic readings, 289-305.
Howe, R., & Covell, K. (2010). Miseducating children about their rights. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 5, 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197910370724.
Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Jackson, C. J. (2011). How sensation seeking provides a common basis for functional and dysfunctional outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 29–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.11.005.
Krupić, D., & Corr, P. J. (2017). Moving forward with the BAS: Towards a neurobiology of multidimensional model of approach motivation. Psihologijske Teme, 26(1), 25–45.
Krupić, D. & Corr, P. J. (2019). How reinforcement sensitivity theory relates to self-determination theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 155, 109705. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109705
Krupić, D., & Corr, P. J. (2014). Individual differences in emotion elicitation in university examinations: A quasi-experimental study. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 176–180. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.001
Krupić, D., Gračanin, A., & Corr, P. J. (2016). The evolution of the behavioural approach system (BAS): Cooperative and competitive resource acquisition strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.044
Lansdown, G. (2005). The evolving capabilities of the child. UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. UNICEF.
McCowan, T. (2012). Human rights within education: Assessing the justifications. Cambridge Journal of Education 42(1), 67–81.
Merdović, B., Počuča, M. & Dragojlović, J. (2024). Parental Supervision and Control as a Predictive Factor of Juvenile Delinquency. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 12(1), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2024-12-1-239-250
Milton, Q. V. (2010). Confiabilidad y coeficiente Alpha de Cronbach. Telos, 12 (2), 248 252. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/993/99315569010.pdf
Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities (Vol. 2). Princeton University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Harvard University Press.
Organización de Naciones Unidas (ONU, 1989). Convención Internacional sobre los Derechos del Niño. Adoptada y abierta a la firma y ratificación por la Asamblea General en su Resolución 44/25, de 20 de noviembre de 1989. Entrada en vigor: 2 de septiembre de 1990, de conformidad con el artículo 491999.
Percy-Smith, B. (2023). A handbook of children and young people’s participation: Conversations for transformational change. Taylor and Francis.
Raposa, E. B., Laws, H. B., & Ansell, E. B. (2016). Prosocial behavior mitigates the negative effects of stress in everyday life. Clinical Psychological Science, 4(4), 691-698. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702615611073
Resh, N., & Sabbagh, C. (2009). Justice in teaching. In L. J. Saha and A. G. Dworkin (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers and teaching (pp. 669–682). Springer.
Resh, N., & Sabbagh, C. (2017). Sense of justice in school and civic behavior. Social Psychology of Education, 20, 387-409. DOI 10.1007/s11218-017-9375-0
Rudolph, K. D., Davis, M. M., Skymba, H. V., Modi, H. H., & Telzer, E. H. (2021). Social experience calibrates neural sensitivity to social feedback during adolescence: A functional connectivity approach. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 47, 100903.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507-514.
Villanueva-Blasco, V.J., González Amado, B., Colomo Magaña, E., and Puig-Perez, S. (2024). Model of structural equations on the perception of aspects of school life and substance consumption as predictors of problem behavior in adolescents. Front. Psychiatry, 15, 1386927. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1386927
Vissing, Y. (2023a). Framing Child Rights Within Academic Disciplines. In Y. Vissing, (Ed.). Children’s Human Rights in the USA: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 39-59). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30848-2_9
Vissing, Y. (2023b). Rightsology. In Y. Vissing, (Ed.). Children’s Human Rights in the USA: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 313-328). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30848-2_9
Vissing, Y. (2023c). Systems of Child Participation in the USA. In Y. Vissing, (Ed.). Children’s Human Rights in the USA: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 399- 431). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30848-2_9
Vissing, Y. (2023d). The 3 Ps of Provision, Protection, and Participation. In Y. Vissing, (Ed.). Children’s Human Rights in the USA: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 331-346). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30848-2_9
Wang-Lu, H., Comim, F., & Valerio Mendoza, O. M. (2024). Valuing Children: Parents’ Perceptions, Spending Priorities and Children’s Capabilities. The Journal of Development Studies, 60(6), 932-955. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2024.2312831
West, S., Currant, P., & Fincham, J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.). Structural Equation Modeling. Concepts, Issues, and Applications (pp. 56-75). Sage Publications.
Wilkinson, C., & Wilkinson, S. (2024). Principles of participatory research. In I. Coyne, & B. Carter. (eds), Being Participatory: Researching with Children and Young People: Co-constructing Knowledge Using Creative, Digital and Innovative Techniques (pp. 15-37). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71228-4