Vicente Josué Aguilera-Rueda
Universidad Veracruzana
ORCID: 0000-0002-1952-7860
Mayra Minerva Méndez Anota
Universidad Veracruzana
ORCID: 0000-0002-8243-6419
Acerca de
La conceptualización, estructura y gestión de las empresas como una organización, tanto a nivel local como global, se fundamentan en la teoría general de sistemas (TGS). La teoría visualiza a la organización como un ente complejo con elementos que comparten objetivos comunes y que desempeñan funciones específicas, lo que la convierte en un sistema abierto, ya que permite intercambiar información entre su interior y el entorno. En este sentido, desde el enfoque de la TGS, las organizaciones, como sistemas, poseen diversas características entre ellas; propósito, globalismo, entropía, equifinalidad, homeostasis, entre otras. La homeostasis es una propiedad que equilibra dinámicamente a los sistemas, de tal forma que mantengan una condición interna estable ante los cambios en el entorno, de la misma forma las organizaciones están obligadas a renovar sus competencias para adaptarse a entornos, internos y externos, que cambian rápidamente.
Garzón Castrillón (2015) ha propuesto un modelo de las capacidades dinámicas de las organizaciones, en el que se considera, entre otras capacidades de las organizaciones, la innovación, la cual debe ser congruente con las relaciones entre los recursos y capacidades de la empresa entre sus productos y servicios que opera en un entorno de rápido cambio.
Uno de los retos más relevantes del siglo para la organización es lograr enfoques estratégicos al hacer negocios y crear productos de valor a largo plazo con la garantía de operaciones que no tenga un impacto negativo en la sociedad, es decir, lograr estrategias empresariales sostenibles. Es en este sentido que la capacidad de innovación puede promover la mejora continua, facilitar la adaptación a cambios ambientales y regulaciones, y generar valor a largo plazo.
Referencias
Almeida, F. y Wasim, J. (2023). Eco-innovation and sustainable business performance: perspectives of SMEs in Portugal and the UK. Society and Business Review, 18(1), 28–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-12-2021-0233
Alraja, M. N., Alshubiri, F., Khashab, B. M. y Shah, M. (2023a). The financial access, ICT trade balance and dark and bright sides of digitalization nexus in OECD countries. Eurasian Economic Review, 13(2), 177–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00228-w
Alraja, M. N., Alshubiri, F., Khashab, B. M. y Shah, M. (2023b). The financial access, ICT trade balance and dark and bright sides of digitalization nexus in OECD countries. Eurasian Economic Review, 13(2), 177–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00228-w
Ardito, L. (2023). The influence of firm digitalization on sustainable innovation performance and the moderating role of corporate sustainability practices: An empirical investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(8), 5252–5272. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3415
Ávila-Robinson, A., Islam, N. y Sengoku, S. (2022). Exploring the knowledge base of innovation research: Towards an emerging innovation model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121804
Bähr, K. y Fliaster, A. (2023). The twofold transition: Framing digital innovations and incumbents’ value propositions for sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(2), 920–935. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3082
Bimonte, G., Ioppolo, G., Senatore, L. y Trincone, B. (2023). Government eco‐innovation incentives in a recycling system: A Stackelberg‐type model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 3792–3800. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3337
Buhalis, D., O’Connor, P. y Leung, R. (2023). Smart hospitality: from smart cities and smart tourism towards agile business ecosystems in networked destinations. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(1), 369–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2022-0497
Chaudhuri, R., Chatterjee, S., Mariani, M. M. y Wamba, S. F. (2024). Assessing the influence of emerging technologies on organizational data driven culture and innovation capabilities: A sustainability performance perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, 123165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123165
Chin, T., Shi, Y., Singh, S. K., Agbanyo, G. K. y Ferraris, A. (2022). Leveraging blockchain technology for green innovation in ecosystem-based business models: A dynamic capability of values appropriation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183, 121908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121908
Dhir, A., Talwar, S., Islam, N., Alghafes, R. y Badghish, S. (2023). Different strokes for different folks: Comparative analysis of 3D printing in large, medium and small firms. Technovation, 125, 102792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102792
DiBella, J. (2020). The spatial representation of business models for climate adaptation: An approach for business model innovation and adaptation strategies in the private sector. Business Strategy & Development, 3(2), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.92
Dubey, R., Bryde, D. J., Foropon, C., Tiwari, M. y Gunasekaran, A. (2022). How frugal innovation shape global sustainable supply chains during the pandemic crisis: lessons from the COVID-19. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 27(2), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-02-2021-0071
Earle, A. G. y Leyva-de la Hiz, D. I. (2021). The wicked problem of teaching about wicked problems: Design thinking and emerging technologies in sustainability education. Management Learning, 52(5), 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507620974857
Engwall, M., Kaulio, M., Karakaya, E., Miterev, M. y Berlin, D. (2021). Experimental networks for business model innovation: A way for incumbents to navigate sustainability transitions? Technovation, 108, 102330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102330
Forés, B. y Fernández-Yáñez, J. M. (2023). Sustainability performance in firms located in a science and technology park: the influence of knowledge sources and absorptive capacity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(11), 112–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2022-0883
Friedman, N. y Ormiston, J. (2022). Blockchain as a sustainability-oriented innovation?: Opportunities for and resistance to Blockchain technology as a driver of sustainability in global food supply chains. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121403
Fuentes Álvarez, T. E. y Torres Cruz, E. J. (2022). Organizaciones reticulares en la postmodernidad. Dissertare Revista De Investigación En Ciencias Sociales, 7(2), 1–20.
Garzón Castrillón, M. A. (2015). Modelo de capacidades dinámicas. Dimensión Empresarial, 13(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.15665/rde.v13i1.341
George, B. y Wooden, O. (2023). Managing the Strategic Transformation of Higher Education through Artificial Intelligence. Administrative Sciences, 13(9), 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13090196
Ghazinoory, S., Ranjbar, A. y Saheb, T. S. (2024). Evolution of the STIP literature: discovering the growing role of innovation governance concepts. Science and Public Policy, 51(1), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad061
Gupta, M. y Jauhar, S. K. (2023). Digital innovation: An essence for Industry 4.0. Thunderbird International Business Review, 65(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22337
He, T., Liu, M. J., Phang, C. W. y Luo, J. (2022). Toward social enterprise sustainability: The role of digital hybridity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121360
Hellström, D. y Olsson, J. (2024). Let’s go thrift shopping: Exploring circular business model innovation in fashion retail. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 198, 123000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123000
Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J. y Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INFSOF.2008.09.009
Kraus, S., Kallmuenzer, A., Kanbach, D. K., Krysta, P. M. y Steinhoff, M. M. (2023). An integrative framework for business model innovation in the tourism industry旅游业商业模式创新的综合框架. The Service Industries Journal, 43(1–2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2022.2127690
Kuhlmann, M., Bening, C. R. y Hoffmann, V. H. (2023). How incumbents realize disruptive circular innovation ‐ Overcoming the innovator’s dilemma for a circular economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(3), 1106–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3109
Li, X., Zhang, L. y Cao, J. (2023). Research on the mechanism of sustainable business model innovation driven by the digital platform ecosystem. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 68, 101738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2023.101738
Liu, H., Liu, Z., Zhang, C. y Li, T. (2023). Transformational insurance and green credit incentive policies as financial mechanisms for green energy transitions and low-carbon economic development. Energy Economics, 126, 107016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107016
Luo, X., Cao, D., Tjahjono, B. y Adegbile, A. (2022). Business model innovation themes of emerging market enterprises: Evidence in China. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1619–1630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.080
Mac Lennan, M. L. F., Tiago, E. F. y Pereira, C. E. C. (2023). Technological and non-technological trends in fashion eco-innovations. Innovation & Management Review, 20(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-12-2020-0177
Maldonado-Guzmán, G. y Pinzón-Castro, S. Y. (2022). Financial resources, eco-innovation and sustainability performance in automotive industry. Tec Empresarial, 16(2), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.18845/te.v16i2.6169
Mavri, M., Fronimaki, E. y Kadrefi, A. (2023). Survey analysis for the adoption of 3D printing technology: consumers’ perspective. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 14(2), 353–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-02-2020-0023
Medina-Álvarez, E. y Sánchez-Medina, P. S. (2023). Types of organizational culture and sustainability in ecotourism businesses in southern Mexico. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 28(56), 386–403. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-12-2021-0267
Mousavi, S., Hellsmark, H. y Söderholm, P. (2023). How can pilot and demonstration plants drive market formation? Lessons from advanced biofuel development in Europe. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, 122703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122703
Neligan, A., Baumgartner, R. J., Geissdoerfer, M. y Schöggl, J. (2023). Circular disruption: Digitalisation as a driver of circular economy business models. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(3), 1175–1188. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3100
Popkova, E. G., Bogoviz, A. V., Ekimova, K. V. y Sergi, B. S. (2023). Will Russia become a blueprint for emerging nations’ high-tech reforms? evidence from a 26-countries dataset. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 7(4), 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2023.05.001
Rayna, T. y Striukova, L. (2021). Assessing the effect of 3D printing technologies on entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 120483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120483
Rayna, T. y West, J. (2023). Where digital meets physical innovation: Reverse salients and the unrealized dreams of 3D printing. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 40(4), 530–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12681
Roh, T., Xiao, S. S. y Park, B. Il. (2023). Effects of open innovation on eco-innovation in meta-organizations: evidence from Korean SMEs. Asian Business & Management, 22(5), 2004–2028. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-023-00238-1
Sabaruddin, L. O., MacBryde, J. y D’Ippolito, B. (2023). The dark side of business model innovation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25(1), 130–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12309
Sharma, A., Deshmukh, S. S. y Ojha, A. (2023). Business Model Innovation to Address Vegetable Supply Chain Issues: A Case Study of an Indian Startup. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 20(02). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877023500086
Sieg, P., Posadzińska, I. y Jóźwiak, M. (2023). Academic entrepreneurship as a source of innovation for sustainable development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, 122695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122695
Sott, M. K., Furstenau, L. B., Kipper, L. M., Reckziegel Rodrigues, Y. P., López-Robles, J. R., Giraldo, F. D. y Cobo, M. J. (2021). Process modeling for smart factories: using science mapping to understand the strategic themes, main challenges and future trends. Business Process Management Journal, 27(5), 1391–1417. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-05-2020-0181
Sukri, N. K. A., Zulkiffli, S. N. ‘Atikah, Mat, N. H. N., Omar, K., Mawardi, M. K. y Zaidi, N. F. Z. (2023). An Analysis of Eco-Innovation Capabilities among Small and Medium Enterprises in Malaysia. Administrative Sciences, 13(4), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13040113
Tian, Y. y Kamran, Q. (2023). Creating Value for Sustainability by Transforming the Food Well-being Paradigm—Alternative New Food Product Development. Journal of Creating Value, 9(2), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/23949643231184167
Yang, Y., Liang, M., Sun, S. y Zou, Y. (2023). Strengthening top–down design? Mapping science, technology and innovation policy developments in China in the age of COVID-19. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 31(2), 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2022.2070508